Riding Two Tracks By A. M. ROSENTHAL New York Times - October 8, 1999 In New York over the past few days, two major opponents in Israeli political life separately raised somber and fundamentally identical questions about the problems of achieving peace between Israel and the Arabs. The two men, who spoke before different audiences at different times, were David Levy, now Foreign Minister under Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and Ariel Sharon, leader of the Likud opposition. If Mr. Barak publicly gives those questions the same emphasis, the possibility of a permanent peace would become somewhat more realistic. If he does not, or if the U.S. does not agree they are critically important, the best that can be hoped for in the Israel-Palestine talks would be an interim before another war. Paraphrased, the questions Mr. Levy and Mr. Sharon raised separately are: What do the Arabs mean by peace? Does it include continuing pressure on Israel, continuing opposition to borders safe for Israel, continuing to break promises for hate control -- in propaganda and in schools? When will the Palestinian Authority reduce its army, as promised, give up specified weapons as promised? Can Israel afford to sign a final settlement before the Palestinians carry out every promise they have already broken? That would be no guarantee for the future, but it would provide the hopeful some confidence. True, Israelis make promise-breaking easy. At the Wye conference last year, the Netanyahu Government and the Palestinians agreed to reciprocity of concession. A step-by-step timetable was created -- terrorism control tied to land concessions, for instance. That timetable seems to have disappeared; zip, like that. The questions are not new; most have existed unanswered for almost a decade, all through Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. That makes them more and more important, not less. What is very new and very important is that Mr. Levy chose to talk about them, in New York, at a time when the U.N. was smacking Israel with its usual package of insult, including a Palestinian delegate's reference to Mr. Barak as a provocateur making "crazy" decisions. Mr. Levy is sure the Prime Minister believes in the importance of the questions his Foreign Minister was asking. But Mr. Barak has not given the questions the public attention they need in Israel and abroad. There's still time. In the world press, Mr. Sharon comes out as a Jewish Patton lusting for war. But the truth is he is devoted to protecting the Israeli nest, not flooding it with blood by seeking war. Mr. Levy, once a Likud leader himself, is portrayed as a heavy, mumbly type -- maybe because he has neglected to learn English well enough to put himself across to journalists who have neglected to learn Hebrew. This is the key to the Foreign Minister: He longs for peace but will not accept the two-track system. On track one, Israel makes serial concessions. Track two: Arabs keep threatening boycott and violence if they are annoyed by Israel. Meantime, with the help of member nations, Arabs make the U.N. their personal anti-Israeli propaganda machine -- a special committee and a special U.N. bureaucratic department for the Palestinian cause, and tons of resolutions passed to demean Israel. I believe the U.S. should remove the shame of being behind in dues. Maybe U.N. members could save a few dollars by eliminating that nasty Palestinian apparatus. What the U.N. gives Israel is a ghetto. Dore Gold, leaving soon after a tour as one of the best U.N. representatives Israel ever had, points out that membership in regional groups is a requirement for nomination to the Security Council. The Mideastern nations won't allow Israel into their group. Normally countries outside regional groups because of politics or geography are taken in by others. Australia and Canada are in the European group, and served on the Security Council. But every year the Europeans blackball Israel, leaving it alone in its ghetto. Richard Holbrooke, the new U.S. delegate to the U.N., is trying his best to break down the European walls for Israel. It will be difficult for the Arabs to break the Israeli passion to achieve peace. But if they keep riding that track of insult and threat at the U.N., who knows, they may accomplish it.