Smooth talk By Rabbi Berel Wein (February 1) The joint Israeli-Palestinian news conference of last Saturday night was an example of smooth talk at its most extreme. The sides proclaimed with straight faces that these were the most serious talks ever held between them and that there was never such a good feeling and understanding between the parties as was exhibited at these talks. Of course, the talks produced no results, but this was blamed on the shortage of time before the forthcoming election this Tuesday. But if one listened carefully to the Palestinian spokesman, one heard that the gaps in the positions are still very wide, that the issue of returning all of the refugees is the Palestinian "red line" (Israel, of course, has no "red lines" left) and if the PA cannot obtain all that it desires on the negotiating table it will just keep on killing Jews, something that it has been doing for many, many decades. He also stated that all of the further and until now one-sided Israeli concessions made at Taba were binding on Israel no matter which government comes to power in Israel, even though no formal document of agreement was ever signed. Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami on the other hand, stressed how serious and frank the talks were and how good the atmosphere between the parties was. What about the eight years of talks since this whole disastrous process began? Were they not serious and frank? How about the handshakes and the joking and the friendship between the Palestinian and Israeli negotiators until now? Was that not for real? You mean we gave away 42% of the West Bank frivolously without really serious and frank discussions? Peace is not achieved solely through good atmosphere or serious and frank discussion between negotiators. It is achieved by behavior and public expressions of attitude by the parties on the ground itself. And our Palestinian ex-partners in the "peace process" have proven themselves woefully inadequate on that count over the last years. Israel needs no more smooth talk about our true prospects of peace and security. We had enough of it from US president Bill Clinton and from those of our leaders who were duped into bringing us to the sad situation that we find ourselves in today. WHAT ISRAEL needs is hard talk. No more false illusions, no more pie-in-the-sky fantasies about the "rose garden" of the Middle East, no more zigzags. And what we need desperately is to be able to talk to each other, seriously, frankly, in a friendly manner about the problems that face us. What about Yossi Sarid and Yosef Lapid talking to the haredim in a serious, frank and friendly matter about the issues that divide them? Wouldn't that be a novel idea? Why can't they imagine them to be Palestinians? Instead we are treated to the knee-jerk, near-hysterical reaction of Meretz to every statement of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, to Lapid's constant venom toward religious Jews, to a "civil revolution" that can only tear our social fabric further asunder. And for what gain? Who really feels persecuted in this country? Why is there no smooth talk present in those areas of Israeli life where it is most needed and could prove extremely beneficial? There is a life after the failure of the Oslo Agreements. We tried our best and somehow it did not turn out the way we had hoped. So, now let us try to pick up the pieces and try to rebuild ourselves. We are seen today by the Arabs and much of the world as being soft, vulnerable, without principles and idealism. We should therefore repair that image. We should stop "understanding" our enemy. We should listen instead to the pain of those widowed and orphaned by the murderers who continue to wage war against us while their representatives hold frank and serious discussions in a good atmosphere with us about the dismembering of the Jewish State. We should begin to talk to each other civilly, not in bombast and hatred. And we should realize that Israel is a dream of millennia and that the Jewish past is not capable of being cavalierly jettisoned in favor of a feel-good present and a utopian secular tomorrow. The religious camp in Israel should also learn the value of smooth talk. Not every insult has to be returned in kind, nor do provocative statements aid our cause. "The words of the wise are stated softly, gently, smoothly." We should learn to smile more often at our fellow Jews and frown less at them. We should appear less threatening, less imposing, less demanding. We speak of love of other Jews as a goal, but I think that first we have to attain civility of language and tolerance of differing opinions. If we can fill this hole in our own hearts, then smooth talk can become an asset and not a danger. Shabbat Shalom